Thursday, September 5, 2013

New York in black in white in the 1980s

Some photos I took in New York in the 1980s.


Union Square Park undergoing renovations, 1985. The S. Klein department store, closed in 1975 and razed in 1987, in the left background.

USS Maine Monument, Columbus Circle, as seen from Central Park

Brooklyn Bridge, looked at Manhattan. Notice World Trade Center on the right.

The Air Line Diner, near La Guardia Airport. Seen in GOODFELLAS.

Queenboro Plaza station of the 7 train. On the left in the distance are the new Silvercup Studios sign and the Citicorp building

Don't know where this is
The FDR Drive, with the famous PepsiCo sign in Long Island City in the background

Mondale - Ferraro rally in Midtown, 1984, on 6th Avenue. "Reagan will raise taxes, too." - no wonder they lost!

The Age of Graffiti. The shadow outline in the back was all over town



Sunday, September 1, 2013

The Canyon Crier

This post concerns not a documentary, but a document, dear readers.

I recently helped my friend Fritz clear out the Van Nuys home of his aunt, who had recently died. It seemed she threw nothing away, and there remained the physical evidence of over 50 years of her life in that house. Most of it was not worth saving, but there were gems among the trash. Ironically, the most important papers of the time, the legal documents of her lawyer father (Fritz's grandfather and namesake), were now worthless, but the "disposable" paper - product boxes, magazines, flyers, ads, and newspapers, are now gold to those interested in the history of the middle of the 20th Century.

I found a few copies of a local paper called The Canyon Crier, from late 1959 to early 1960.



The Crier served the communities of Whitley Heights, Outpost, Vine Crest, Beverly Glen, Sunset Plaza, Beverly Hills, Bel Air; Laurel, Benedict, Coldwater, Nichols, Beachwood and Bronson Canyons; Hollywood Knolls, Roscomare, Hollywood Manor, Cahuenga View, Toluca Lake and Briarcliff.

Though the actual articles tend to be of limited interest (zoning hearings, junior league tennis tournaments, rummage sales, etc.), there is plenty to attract the eye of the historically inclined. For example, Alan Watts is giving a lecture.



Notice that even the then he was heard on KPFK. We usual think that the turn toward Eastern spirituality in the U.S. happened much later in the 60s, but it's clear this trend had already begun - there's an ad for the Vedanta Temple in Hollywood on the same page as this announcement.

What's playing at the movies?



The ad gets it right: these are two British classics, playing at the Fox Lido, on Pico at La Cienega (which is long gone.)


Michael Todd's Smell-O-Vision spectacular, SCENT OF MYSTERY, at the Ritz (also long gone.)



At the Monica International Theater (also long gone - I sense a pattern here), the portmanteau ANATOMY OF LOVE and Russ Meyer's THE AMORAL MR. TEAS.



Happy that the Supreme Court saw fit to allow our forebears to watch LADY CHATTERLY'S LOVER. Finally, a theater that still exists - the Vista!




Back to defunct theaters, the Oriental and the Pan Pacific. Satyajit's Ray's masterpiece, PATHER PANCHELLI [sic - PANCHALI] on the bottom of a double bill with Jules Dassin's HE WHO MUST DIE.




Reginald Denny, British born silent film star, later had success as a character actor in talkies. He served in the Royal Flying Corps in World War I, and opened a model plane shop in 1934. He and a partner  manufactured drones during World War II!



"Theme" and "ethnic" restaurants were popular. Visit the new Foreign Correspondents Room! (Stroll on over after seeing LOOK BACK IN ANGER - Pico and La Cienega was a happening spot).




Who knew that in 1960 Big Corporations had a sense of humor? Can you imagine an ad like this today?



Real estate prices were a little different then. Of course, so were salaries.




Saturday, August 31, 2013

Films from DuArt Find Their New Home

On August 16th, 194 boxes of film arrived from DuArt to the Film Archive. Most of them contain original picture and track negatives. As I mentioned in a previous post, this includes many docs, but also shorts, independent features, and student films. About a week later, I began processing the materials into the collection. So far, I've worked on:

1) Sharon Sopher's 1986 Doc Feature Nominee, WITNESS TO APARTHEID
2) Several of Robert Richter's films, including his 1982 Doc Short Nominee, GODS OF METAL, as well as ASBESTOS ALERT; BEN SPOCK, BABY DOCTOR; and FOR EXPORT ONLY: PESTICIDES AND PILLS - http://richtervideos.com Mr. Richter has also placed more of his films at the Film Archive that he had held in private storage.
3) Three of James Rutenbeck's docs, LOSING GROUND, RAISE THE DEAD, and COMPANY TOWN. http://www.jamesrutenbeck.com/jr_portfolio.html
4) Amy Talkington's student short films, SECOND SKIN and NUMBER ONE FAN - http://www.amytalkington.com/
5) The Doc Short Nominee CITY OUT OF WILDERNESS (1974)
6) Chris Columbus' NYU student film, I THINK I'M GONNA LIKE IT HERE. 

This is, of course, just the tip of the iceberg, and there's a long, long way to go (and before I finish with these boxes, we'll be getting another shipment from DuArt, with perhaps another 100 boxes.) But I know what I'll be doing the next 6 months or so, and will be giving periodic updates on my progress.

By the way, you might be interested to know what we do with the films when we process them into the collection. We remove them from their original cans or boxes, and make note of any significant information from these containers, including technical information, when the elements were made, etc. We separate any paper materials enclosed, such as lab notes, timing tapes and so on. These are stored separately in acid free envelopes, and a note of this is made in the database record for the item. All important bibliographic data is entered in the title record for the film, and the physical information put into the individual "item" record - film gauge, film stock information, length, type of element, and condition (scratches, dirt, warping, color fading, etc.) Of particular importance is notation of any acetate deterioration (aka "vinegar syndrome"). Thankfully, all the materials I've looked at so far have been in very good to excellent condition. The films are then wound off their cores or reels, onto "archival" cores made of inert plastic, and inspected for any other physical defects. The items are then placed into "archival" cans, and a barcode, printed out from the database record, is placed on each can. Before the cans are put into the vault, the barcode is scanned, so the location information goes into the item record (so we can find it later!)



Tuesday, August 27, 2013

THE BEGINNING OF THE DOCUMENTARY CATEGORIES OF ACADEMY AWARDS®


The Academy Award® Documentary Categories did not begin until the 14th Awards in 1941. But the Academy did recognize non-fiction films (many by notable filmmakers) prior to that, in the Short Subject categories. A 1935 winner, Ivor Montagu’s WINGS OVER MT. EVEREST, showed the first airplane flight over the world’s tallest peak. Fred Zinnemann’s THAT MOTHERS MIGHT LIVE, a winner in 1938, dramatized the medical advances made by a noted Hungarian physician. But these films were not deemed by many to be “documentaries,” a term which then connoted more serious accounts of contemporary issues and events. For the first time in 1940, the Academy considered easing the entry rules for Shorts, to include such “true” documentary films, but only if they had had commercial runs in regular theaters. 
Though some filmmakers were happy to have their films accepted due to this decision, many were not so thrilled, and confusion and controversy ensued. Many fine films, including Willard Van Dyke’s VILLAGE TOWN and CHILDREN MUST LEARN; and John Ferno’s SO THEY LIVE, were not eligible under these rules, as they had not been exhibited in commercial houses, and U.S. government productions played for no charge. But two fine documentaries, Julien Bryan’s SIEGE, which captured on film Germany’s invasion of Poland, and LONDON CAN TAKE IT, by Harry Watt and Humphrey Jennings, that showed British resilience during the Blitz, received nominations in the One-Reel category. Both films are now considered classics.
It became clear to the Shorts Committee, and to the Academy at large, that documentaries could no longer be shoehorned into this category, and that these films had become significant enough to merit their own awards. The Committee considered the topic in their meeting of January 20th, 1941. Discussion on the issue continued throughout the year.
For most of 1941, the United States was still officially neutral in World War II, but being drawn closer into the conflict every day. Certainly the Academy’s recognition of SIEGE and LONDON CAN TAKE IT - films made the previous year about the war in Europe - demonstrated a keen interest in films depicting the foreign war that a majority of Americans still thought should remain foreign. The documentary had been gaining stature during the 1930’s, but the advent of the war signaled the real turning point for non-fiction filmmaking.
So, three days before the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Academy Board of Governors adopted a resolution to consider the possibility of granting Special Awards to documentary productions.  The general Awards Committee met two weeks later on the 17th of December. This Committee consisted of six members from the Screen Actors Guild, four from the Screen Directors Guild, nine producer members from various studios, five Science Branch members, and seven Academy officers ex officio. It noted that,
“United States, British, Canadian, and Russian Government films, [the]‘March of Time,’ a number of other newsreel releases of documentary type, and some other films privately sponsored but shown in regular theatres have been a significant development in the motion picture medium, particularly during the past year, and should achieve Awards® recognition.”

The Awards Committee voted a recommendation that Special Awards be given for the Best Documentary Feature and the Best Documentary Short Subject. At a subsequent meeting of the Board of Governors, this recommendation was approved. Thus, by early January 1942, the Documentary Awards were born!
In a letter to Academy Librarian Margaret Gledhill [Herrick] and Academy Executive Secretary Donald Gledhill dated January 18, 1942, the Dutch born documentarian Joris Ivens wrote, “I am so very glad that at last we are recognized by the Academy and that the documentary film has become one of the ‘decent’ branches of the Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.” Unfortunately for Ivens, his landmark film about electrification of rural areas in the United States, POWER AND THE LAND, was declared ineligible two years in a row. In 1940, it could not compete in the Shorts category because it was a few hundred feet longer than the stipulated length. And since it had been exhibited during 1940, it was not accepted for the 14th Awards, for which only films released in calendar year 1941 were eligible.
It is worth noting that some other worthy films submitted in 1941 were declared ineligible, as they had not played theatrically during. Among them were A CHILD WENT FORTH, by Joseph Losey, concerning a haven for children evacuated from London during the Blitz; and THE FORGOTTEN VILLAGE, directed by Herbert Kline and Alexander Hammid, and written by John Steinbeck, examining the conflicts between modernization and traditional culture in a small Mexican village.
Next, the Academy formed a Documentary Awards Committee, consisting of Richard Macaulay (the chair), Henry Fonda, David O. Selznick, Joseph Valentine and Henry Hathaway.  Macaulay had recently written THEY DRIVE BY NIGHT and would soon pen ACROSS THE PACIFIC [a side note – I have not been able to find an photo of Macaulay anywhere. Very strange]. Fonda had been nominated in 1940 for THE GRAPES OF WRATH, and would narrate several wartime documentaries, including the Oscar® nominated IT’S EVERYBODY’S WAR, and the winner THE BATTLE OF MIDWAY. He also narrated the 1951 doc short winner BENJY, and the doc nominees THE REALLY BIG FAMILY (1966), A SPACE TO GROW (1968) and AN IMPRESSION OF JOHN STEINBECK: WRITER (1969).  SPRING PARADE, WINGS OVER HONOLULU and MAD ABOUT MUSIC were all recent nominations for cinematographer Valentine. Hathaway had been nominated for directing LIVES OF A BENGAL LANCER.
Selznick was coming off his twin triumphs of GONE WITH THE WIND and REBECCA, which won consecutive Best Picture awards. For the 15th Awards, Academy President Walter Wanger asked him to chair the Documentary Committee, and Selznick initially refused, as he wanted to devote all his energies to his next production. A flurry of correspondence from Wanger and his fellow Committee members eventually persuaded Selznick to reluctantly accept the post.
The Documentary Committee first met on February 4th, at 7PM in the Academy Board Room (in the offices in the Taft Building in Hollywood), with Donald Gledhill and Academy Publicity Counsel Hal Hall in attendance (Hathaway couldn’t make the first meeting). They reviewed the list of films to be screened for consideration; Fonda and Hall conducted a drawing by lot to determine the order of presentation. In the early years, the Academy actively sought out documentary entries, with members of the Committee and the Academy at large suggesting appropriate films. In subsequent years, the Academy sent invitation letters to studios, individuals, and the film commissions of many countries. The new category proved to be somewhat ill defined, so the Committee stated,
“It was agreed that the definition of documentary and the eligibility rules were far from clear and comprehensive, and that definite action should be taken during the year to remedy the situation and propose improvements for next year’s Awards Committee.”
And in a move designed to showcase documentaries and increase general awareness of non-fiction films, the Committee
“strongly endorsed a proposal to recommend to the Academy Board that monthly showings whenever feasible be held for the Academy Membership at which outstanding documentary films be featured. It was also recommended that in connection with such showings that the Academy Library should prepare and distribute to the Academy membership small pamphlets describing the new releases and serving to keep the membership up-to-date with developments in the ‘documentary,’‘actuality’ and ‘war reporting’ fields of film use.”
In the feature category, two films stood out: TARGET FOR TO-NIGHT and KUKAN.  Harry Watt’s TARGET FOR TO-NIGHT, the story of a British bomber raid on Germany, had an incalculable morale boosting effect in the United Kingdom, and was eventually shown to an estimated 50 million people in 12,000 theaters in the Western Hemisphere. KUKAN (subtitled THE UNCONQUERABLE SPIRIT OF CHINA) detailed St. Louis journalist Rey Scott’s epic travels through China, documenting both the wide range of cultures as well as the horrific events of the Japanese invasion and the staunch Chinese defense.  Both were then currently in release, but the Committee suggested holding a double bill screening for members who hadn’t yet seen them. The Committee then made an interesting decision:
“We find that during the past year two particularly outstanding documentary features have been shown, KUKAN and TARGET FOR TO-NIGHT. These are each of high quality and production origin as to make competitive voting difficult inasmuch as the field is still too new for standards of comparison to be generally agreed upon, without a competitive vote, a recommendation be made by the Awards Committee that an Awards Certificate of Merit be given to the producers of KUKAN and a similar certificate to the producers of TARGET FOR TO-NIGHT in recognition of their production of these films.”
Thus, there was no official Documentary Feature winner that year. At an Academy Board meeting at the Brown Derby on February 20th, Selznick, Howard Estabrook, John Aalberg, and James Hilton formed a committee to write the text of the citations for KUKAN and TARGET FOR TONIGHT.
The first voting screening for documentaries was held at the Filmarte Theatre at 1228 Vine Street (a block from the current location of the Academy’s Pickford Center and Film Archive), on Tuesday, February 10th. Some of those in attendance (in addition to the Documentary Committee) were Olivia DeHavilland, Farciot Edouart, Howard Estabrook, John Garfield, Norman Reilly Raine, Frank Partos, Sol Lesser, Lesley Selander, Pete Smith, Dorothy Tree and Walter Wanger. The ballots were collected by Price, Waterhouse & Company.
 
A look at the films in competition for the first Documentary Short Subject award:
ADVENTURES IN THE BRONX, produced by Film Associates, with commentary by John Kiernan. This was the first in a series of shorts sponsored by the New York Zoological Society. It shows the experiences of a boy who sneaks into the Bronx Zoo with his toy elephant before the gates are opened.
BOMBER, produced by the Office of Emergency Management, was written and narrated by poet Carl Sandburg. It shows the construction of the B-26 Martin bomber at the Glenn L. Martin plant in Baltimore, from the first production of its 25,000 parts to its first test flight.
CHRISTMAS UNDER FIRE, produced by the British Ministry of Information, and directed by Harry Watt. American journalist Quentin Reynolds narrates this look at the tenacity of British during the bombing by the German Luftwaffe.
CHURCHILL’S ISLAND, produced by the National Film Board of Canada, directed by Stuart Legg, and narrated by Lorne Greene. It describes the Battle of Britain, and shows that Britain could win the war because of the moral strength of its people.
LETTER FROM HOME, produced by the British Ministry of Information, and directed by Carol Reed. Another film salute to the courage of Londoners under the Nazi Blitz juxtaposes a letter from an English mother (Celia Johnson, in her first screen appearance) to her children, who have been evacuated to the US, with the details of her life. Reed later co-directed, with Garson Kanin, the 1945 Documentary Feature Winner THE TRUE GLORY.
LIFE OF A THOROUGHBRED, produced by Truman Talley. Shows how a champion horse is trained, and how he finally becomes a winner. The Calumet Farm in Lexington, Kentucky is depicted, as well as a real champion, Whirlaway. One of the two nominees not examining events of the war.
NORWAY IN REVOLT, produced by the March of Time. A dramatization of the formation of a Norwegian military force in exile, and of Norwegian resistance activities.
A PLACE TO LIVE, produced by the Philadelphia Housing Authority. In the tradition of the great progressive films of the late 1930’s and early 1940’s such as THE RIVER, VALLEY TOWN and THE LAND, director Irving Lerner shows the deleterious effects of slum housing. This lyrical work features a rousing, Coplandesque score.
RUSSIAN SOIL, produced by Amkino. This film, concerning the Russians’ defense of their homeland against the invading Germans, was a last minute replacement for another short subject from the Soviet Union.
SOLDIERS OF THE SKY, produced by Truman Talley. The second nominee produced by Talley, it depicts paratrooper training in Fort Benning, Georgia.
WAR CLOUDS IN THE PACIFIC, produced by the National Film Board of Canada, produced by Stuart Legg and narrated by Lorne Greene. The second NFBC/Legg/Greene film nominated this year, it examines the new and dangerous Japan, and the reaction of the democracies, which erected a vast defense system across the Pacific.
At the 14th Academy Awards ceremony at the Biltmore Hotel on February 26th, CHURCHILL’S ISLAND became the first film to win an Academy Award® in a Documentary category. John Grierson, Film Commissioner of Canada’s National Film Board and the man who coined the term “documentary,” presented the Award to CHURCHILL’S ISLAND, as well as the two Special Awards to TARGET FOR TO-NIGHT and KUKAN. Since all three were considered “special” awards (and because this was an “experimental” category), Grierson handed out Certificate of Merit scrolls, not Oscar statuettes. He began his presentation with a funny and trenchant speech, which brilliantly captured the state of the documentary film at that time:
“Long ago the documentary film set itself the not very popular task of talking about the facts when people were more interested in illusions; of describing social problems which were embarrassing to some and ugly to many; of keeping men’s consciences just a little closer to the dreadful grindstone of actuality. We are all tied today to the grindstone of actuality, and I am glad to be here if only as a symbol that all of us - whatever branch of film making we pursue - are all for one and one for all in a common effort.”


Monday, August 26, 2013

Willkie in China - the Intersection of Film and Politics


One of the joys of working at the Academy Film Archive is coming across an obscure, possibly unique film in the collection which turns out not only to be historically significant, but reveals all sorts of connections going in many directions. I'm a big fan of historical connections, threads and parallels, and find them endlessly fascinating - sometimes these threads seem to go on forever.  I'm not sure exactly when I came across WILLKIE IN CHINA, an unfinished silent newsreel in the Academy's War Film Collection, but it probably coincided with preparations for one of my two Academy-sponsored trips to China, the first in 2007, the second in 2009.

Willkie shakes hands with General Chiang Kai-Shek

I didn't know much about Wendell Willkie (1892-1944), but learned a lot more when I began to research this unique piece of film.  Though it's "only" an unedited newsreel, it's terrifically shot and composed, as these frame grabs demonstrate. And full of historical information. In the Academy War Film files in Special Collections at the Margaret Herrick Library, a folder contains a full "dope sheet" rundown of the film's content.

In 1942, FDR sent Willkie, whom he had defeated in the 1940 Presidential election, on a 49 day goodwill and fact finding mission around the world, with stops in South America, Egypt, England, Iraq, the Soviet Union, and China.  He flew in a converted B-24 Liberator aircraft, and left New York on August 26th, 71 years ago to the day as I write this. In the course of his journey, he discussed the problems of the war with King Farouk of Egypt, British General Bernard ("Monty") Montgomery, General Charles de Gaulle, Joseph Stalin and General Chiang Kai-shek.

A pilot in the clearly antiquated Chinese air force.

At the time, there was still doubt in parts of the world as to the sincerity of the American people in the support of  FDR's prosecution of the war. Who would be better prepared to dissipate doubts regarding the unity of the American people in carrying the war to an Allied victory than the leader of the loyal opposition in the United States? 

Willkie (on the left) at a United China Relief dinner, with Madame Chiang Kai-Shek (to the right of Willkie)

In China, he traveled to Chungking (now Chongqing) Lanchow (now Lanzhou) Sian (now Xi’an), and Chengtu (now Chengdu). At a time when the Chinese people were exhausted after their  resistance to the Japanese invasion for over ten years and their belief that the United States did not fully understand their plight, the visit was timely, to say the least.



Crowds at a Willkie speech

One of the members of the Willkie party in China, Hollington K. Tong (Vice-Minister of Information; graduate of Columbia University, 1913), has an Academy connection. In 1943, the Academy’s Board of Governors invited Tong to become a member of the Documentary Awards Nomination Committee. Mr. Tong declined the invitation, but suggested another person, Dr. H. L. Shia of the Chinese News Service, headquartered in New York City (at 30 Rockefeller Center). which provided the Academy with this Willkie in China newsreel.

Folk performances


When he returned to the US, he wrote of his travels in “One World,” which became a huge best seller. He sold the films rights to Darryl Zanuck and 20th Century-Fox (Willkie had become chairman of the board of Fox in 1942), and there was talk of Spencer Tracy portraying Willkie. In September of 1943 Zanuck asked the Academy if they had any Willkie footage, and a copy of a letter in the Academy files from Margaret Herrick (signed "Mrs. Donald Gledhill") to Zanuck informs him of this newsreel. A handwritten note of the letter notes that Zanuck's secretary called the next day to express his great interest in looking at it.


Six months before his "One World" trip, Willkie spoke for 20 minutes as a special invited guest at the 14th Academy Awards on February 26, 1942. He came on after the Documentary Awards presentation and before the Short Subject Awards. He talked generally about the state of the country and the world, as well as the role of the film industry in the war (remember this was less than three months after Pearl Harbor). Dr. Hu Shih, China's ambassador to United States, spoke at the Show as well.

Willkie with Madame Chiang and the General

It's interesting to note another China connection with the 14th Awards. As you'll know if you read my earlier posts, KUKAN received an honorary Academy Award at this ceremony. Too bad KUKAN's filmmaker, Rey Scott, couldn't attend the Awards Show, because he and Willkie would have had a lot to discuss concerning China.


Chinese officer meets with General Joseph Stillwell


Sunday, August 18, 2013

The Ballad of Gregorio Cortez

I first met the great independent film director Robert M. Young about three years ago, introduced by our mutual friend Sandra Schulberg. She thought I might be interesting in bringing Bob's films into the Film Archive, and she was right! Bob and I communicated off and on for awhile, and he eventually introduced me and my wife Monica to his family, inviting us to dine with them periodically. Bob has had an amazing, long career, making both documentaries and features, and there is no question that his films belong at the Archive. My friendship with Bob coincided with the growing relationship between the Archive and DuArt, owned by Bob's brother Irwin.

Back in December of 2012, the Film Archive received many boxes of original elements from Bob's films, including SHORT EYES and THE BALLAD OF GREGORIO CORTEZ.




As I learned more about GREGORIO CORTEZ, the more interested I became, and thought it a perfect candidate for preservation. It was only available on home video in the US on VHS, and has not been widely seen theatrically since its release in 1982. However, its significance and influence is wide, with probably the first Chicano hero in modern American film, with Edward James Olmos in his breakout role as Cortez. It was one of the earliest, if not the first, feature shot on Super 16mm. A sort of informal team has developed to investigate the preservation of CORTEZ, including Bob Young, Eddie Olmos, Irwin Young, David Leitner, Dave Terman and Bill Baldwin. During a recent dinner with much of the group, Bob and Eddie regaled us with terrific stories about the production and distribution story of the film - it was like a live version of a DVD commentary track.



There are problems, however, both technical and legal. CORTEZ was shot on 16mm, but conformed in 35mm. The Film Archive received the original 16mm camera negative, but this is "flash to flash," with all the selected takes printed end to end. The "original" conformed 35mm negative is believed to be held by Canal Plus in Paris. They own much of the foreign rights to the film, and Sony and MGM split the US domestic rights.


So far, we've been unable to confirm that Canal has the 35mm negative or other pre-print, or the condition of these materials, as they've been less than forthcoming. Even if Canal has these materials, they may not give us access to them. It would be easier and cheaper to create new preservation materials from the 35mm materials, but if they're unavailable, our team may have to resort to plan B, which would involve scanning the original 16mm negative. This would be more complicated and expensive, because of the length of the negative - over 35,000 feet, and the need to basically re-edit the film from scratch (this is a very condensed version of the process, giving you the general idea of what we may have to do).


The search and planning continues. Hopefully soon I'll be able to update with good news on the project.






 

Film History on an Index Card

During World War II, the Academy created the War Film Library, an extensive collection of documentaries, propaganda shorts and newsreels, for use by the studios. The Film Archive has preserved many films from this collection - for more info, see: http://www.oscars.org/events-exhibitions/features/war-films/index.html) The Academy staff at the time thankfully kept very detailed records of this collection, as well as how they worked with it. In my research in Special Collections at the Academy's Margaret Herrick Library, I came across files containing step by step instructions on how to loan a film, including samples of every single form to be filled out and sticker to be affixed. If you studied all this, and were then transported back to 1942, you'd be able to do the job just fine.

In addition, several different card catalogs, documenting both the contents of the Library as well as the movements of the prints survived, and these are held at the Film Archive. I came across the following card while preparing the "Oscar's Docs" retrospective back in 2004.



This card is for a (nitrate!) print of CHURCHILL'S ISLAND, the first film to win an Academy Award in the newly created documentary category, for films made in 1941 (a caveat - two other Oscars were presented to films that year, for KUKAN and TARGET FOR TO-NIGHT, but they were officially "Special Awards."). This print had been submitted for consideration for those first documentary Oscars.

The first "out" is to the Filmarte Theatre, for the "nomination screening" evening. In the infancy of this category, the procedures for how to judge these films was still being worked out, so the sole showing of the submitted films took place in a commercial theater. In attendance were the five members of the Documentary Awards Committee, as well as many Academy members, including several Hollywood stars. Incidentally, the Filmarte Theatre, which was demolished in 1990, was located at 1226 N. Vine Street, just across from where the Film Archive is today.

The film is signed back in by "Sam" - Sam Brown, then assistant to Margaret Gledhill Herrick. Brown later became Herrick's successor, alas only for a short time, as poor health forced his retirement.

The next "out" is to Joris Ivens, the legendary Dutch documentary filmmaker, at USC. Ivens' connection to the new documentary awards is an unfortunate one. He'd submitted his film POWER AND THE LAND for awards consideration in 1940, the year before the doc category was created, for Live Action Short. Quite a few documentary films were nominated or won awards in this category before docs were officially recognized by the Academy. But at 38 minutes, it was 8 minutes too long to be considered a short. Undaunted, Ivens submitted the film in 1941, but was again rebuffed, since the film was ineligible because it had been released the year before!  The "D.G." who personally took the print to Ivens, is Donald Gledhill, Executive Secretary of the Academy, and husband of Margaret Herrick. He left the Academy for military service soon after, in 1943. The film is then sent by messenger to the Taft Building in Hollywood, the home of Academy offices.

Next, the film went to Murray Seldeen, a supervising film editor at Republic, and was signed back in by Grace - Grace Gaunt (my favorite Academy staff name from the period, who sounds like a Gothic novel heroine).

This popular title then went out again a few days later, to Hal Wallis, producer at Warner Bros. (who no doubt was working on CASABLANCA at the time). His papers are at the Herrick Library.

Finally, CHURCHILL'S ISLAND went out to Frank Lloyd Wright at Taliesin West, his winter home, studio and architectural campus (One shudders at the thought of a nitrate print out there in the desert, in the days before air conditioning). The first phase of construction of this landmark had been completed just two years before. One wonders about Wright's interest in the film. And though Hal Wallis and Joris Ivens had kept the film only a couple of days each, Wright was allowed to have the print "for an indefinite period." Thankfully, CHURCHILL'S ISLAND was returned to the Library. And good thing, too, because it became the basis of the Film Archive's preservation of the film in 2004, as it was the best known surviving source.